Conspiracy theories have become increasingly prevalent and normalized in the past decade, giving rise to concerns about their impact on society. On one hand, conspiracy theories are often seen as irrational beliefs, while on the other hand, their advocates are often portrayed as radical or extremist. However, it is important to recognize that these portrayals are often oversimplifications that fail to capture the complex dynamics of online conspiracy culture.
In a research article titled “Participatory Conspiracy Culture: Believing, Doubting, and Playing with Conspiracy Theories on Reddit,” Lars de Wildt and Stef Aupers aim to shed light on the everyday online debates about conspiracy theories. By focusing on the subreddit r/conspiracy on Reddit, the researchers conducted a 6-month ethnographic study, analyzing 242 selected discussions and utilizing the digital methods tool 4CAT. Their findings challenge the notion of online conspiracy culture as a homogenous echo chamber of radical belief, revealing a diverse and heterogeneous participatory culture.
What is Participatory Conspiracy Culture?
Participatory conspiracy culture refers to the collective engagement and discourse surrounding conspiracy theories in online spaces. The researchers emphasize that it is essential to move beyond simplistic depictions of conspiracy culture and explore the multifaceted nature of these discussions. By studying participatory conspiracy culture, the aim is to understand how individuals participate in these online debates and interact with one another.
How Do People Participate in Online Conspiracy Culture?
The research identifies three distinct epistemological positions in participatory conspiracy culture: belief, doubt, and play. Through their analysis of the r/conspiracy subreddit, the researchers found that these positions shape the dynamics of discussions within the community.
Belief: Participants who hold a belief-based epistemological position tend to discredit opposing beliefs and reaffirm their own convictions. This constant discreditation of others’ beliefs creates a contentious atmosphere within the community.
Doubt: Conversely, participants who adopt a doubt-based epistemological position express skepticism towards conspiracy theories. They engage in critical questioning and challenge prevailing narratives, contributing to a more nuanced and varied discourse.
Play: The play-based epistemological position involves engaging with conspiracy theories for entertainment purposes, often without taking them seriously. Participants in this group enjoy the thrill of entertaining conspiracy theories without necessarily endorsing or believing in them.
Is Online Conspiracy Culture Homogeneous?
The research findings demonstrate that online conspiracy culture, specifically within the r/conspiracy subreddit, is far from homogeneous. Rather, it is a diverse and heterogeneous participatory culture where conflicting epistemological positions clash and shape the debates. The authors argue against the oversimplified portrayal of conspiracy culture as a monolithic belief system.
Additionally, the researchers reveal that discussions within participatory conspiracy culture are not solely centered around conspiracy theories themselves. Other topics, such as politics, science, and history, often intertwine with conspiracy theories, leading to complex and multidimensional conversations.
What Are the Epistemological Positions in Participatory Conspiracy Culture?
The study identifies three main epistemological positions that influence how individuals participate in online conspiracy culture: belief, doubt, and play. These positions reflect different attitudes towards conspiracy theories and shape the nature of interactions within the community.
Belief: Participants who adopt a belief-based epistemological position are firm believers in conspiracy theories. They often seek to promote their own beliefs while discrediting the beliefs of others, leading to conflicting debates and a polarized atmosphere.
Doubt: Individuals with a doubt-based epistemological position approach conspiracy theories with skepticism. They question prevailing narratives, often engaging in critical analysis and seeking alternative explanations. Their contributions contribute to a more nuanced and multifaceted discourse.
Play: The play-based epistemological position involves a lighthearted engagement with conspiracy theories. Participants in this category enjoy entertaining conspiracy theories without necessarily endorsing or believing in them. They contribute to the diversity of perspectives within the participatory culture.
Overall, the research highlights the complexity of online conspiracy culture, illustrating that it is not solely defined by radical beliefs but rather a heterogeneous landscape of conflicting epistemological positions.
To fully grasp the intricacies of participatory conspiracy culture and gain a more comprehensive understanding, it is crucial to move beyond simplistic characterizations and delve into the multifaceted nature of these debates.
By shedding light on the diverse dynamics within participatory conspiracy culture, this research encourages a more nuanced approach to studying and understanding the social phenomenon of conspiracy theories in online spaces.
For more information on the research article “Participatory Conspiracy Culture: Believing, Doubting, and Playing with Conspiracy Theories on Reddit” by Lars de Wildt and Stef Aupers, please visit the source article.
Leave a Reply