In a research article published in Child Development in 2002, Jeff Kiesner, Mara Cadinu, François Poulin, and Monica Bucci explored the concept of group identification in early adolescence and its relationship with peer adjustment and peer influence on delinquent behavior. The study aimed to determine whether the importance of belonging to a group was associated with individual-group similarity in problem behavior and if group identification moderated the impact of peer group influence on the development of delinquent behavior over a one-year period.
By understanding the relationship between group identification, peer adjustment, and peer influence during early adolescence, this research sheds light on the factors that contribute to the social and behavioral development of individuals in peer groups. This article will expound on the study’s findings in a comprehensible manner and discuss their implications in terms of understanding peer group influence on individuals.
What is the Relation between Group Identification and Peer Adjustment in Early Adolescence?
The study conducted by Kiesner et al. (2002) focused on examining the association between group identification and peer adjustment during early adolescence. Group identification refers to the significance of the group to an individual, emphasizing the importance of belonging and identifying with a particular social group. Peer adjustment relates to an individual’s ability to adapt socially within their peer group, encompassing factors such as social acceptance, peer relations, and behavioral alignment with group norms.
The researchers aimed to determine whether there was a correlation between group identification and individual-group similarity in problem behavior. In other words, they wanted to understand if individuals who identified strongly with a specific group also exhibited similar behavioral patterns to their peers within that group. The study found that the level of reciprocated nominations within an individual’s self-nominated group significantly affected the individual-group behavioral similarity. This means that individuals who were reciprocally nominated within their group were more likely to exhibit behavioral similarity to their peers.
For example, let’s consider a group of adolescents who share a love for playing soccer. Those who receive reciprocal nominations from their peers in the group, indicating a mutual liking and acceptance, are more likely to align their behavior with the group’s standards. They may adopt similar playing styles, strategies, or even engage in similar problematic behaviors if endorsed within the group. This demonstrates how the level of reciprocated nominations within a group can influence an individual’s behavioral alignment with their peers.
“The level of reciprocated nominations within the individuals self-nominated group was found to covary with individual-group behavioral similarity.”‘ – Kiesner et al. (2002)
Does Group Identification Moderate Peer Group Influence on Delinquent Behavior?
The second aspect examined by Kiesner et al. (2002) was whether group identification moderated the influence of peer groups on an individual’s development of delinquent behavior over a one-year period. The researchers sought to understand if the strength of an individual’s identification with their peer group would impact the level of susceptibility to peer influence on engaging in delinquent activities.
The study discovered that group identification did indeed moderate peer group influence on an individual’s change in delinquent behavior. Group identification acted as a protective or mitigating factor against the negative effects of peer influence. This suggests that individuals who strongly identified with their group were less likely to succumb to peer pressure towards delinquency.
For instance, consider a group of friends in early adolescence who regularly engage in neighborhood mischief. An individual who highly identifies with this group, feeling a strong sense of belonging and camaraderie, may find it easier to resist engaging in delinquent behaviors. Their identification with the group acts as a shield, preventing them from succumbing to peer pressure. On the other hand, individuals with weaker group identification may be more susceptible to negative peer influence, leading to an increase in delinquent behavior.
“Group identification was found to moderate peer group influence on the individuals change in delinquent behavior, across one year.”‘ – Kiesner et al. (2002)
What Factors are Related to an Individual’s Level of Group Identification?
In addition to examining the correlation between group identification, peer adjustment, and peer influence, Kiesner et al. (2002) also explored factors that were related to an individual’s level of group identification. The researchers recognized that various aspects of an individual’s social context could influence the strength of their group identification.
The study revealed several factors that were associated with an individual’s level of group identification. Firstly, an individual’s peer status within their classroom was found to impact their level of group identification. Popular individuals or those who held a high social standing within their peer group were more likely to exhibit a stronger identification with their group. On the other hand, individuals who had lower peer status were less likely to identify strongly with their group.
Secondly, the level of reciprocated nominations, indicating mutual acceptance and liking within the group, influenced an individual’s group identification. Individuals who received more reciprocal nominations from their peers reported a higher level of identification with the group. This suggests that a positive social environment, where individuals feel valued and accepted by their peers, positively influences their sense of identification within the group.
Finally, gender was also found to have a relationship with an individual’s level of group identification. The study found gender differences in group identification, with girls tending to identify more strongly with their groups compared to boys. This could be attributed to variations in socialization patterns, cultural expectations, or differences in the significance placed on group belonging for girls compared to boys.
Takeaways
The research conducted by Kiesner et al. (2002) delves into the complex dynamics of group identification, peer adjustment, and peer influence during early adolescence. The findings of this study emphasize the importance of understanding how the identification with a group influences an individual’s behavioral alignment and susceptibility to peer influence. By recognizing the factors related to group identification, such as peer status, reciprocated nominations, and gender, we can gain valuable insights into the social and behavioral development of individuals within peer groups.
This study highlights the protective role of group identification against negative peer influence on engaging in delinquent behavior. Striving to foster a positive social environment and promoting a sense of belonging within peer groups may contribute to the development of stronger group identification and, in turn, deter deviant behaviors. Understanding these complex relationships during early adolescence aids in formulating targeted interventions and support systems to promote healthy social and behavioral development.
To read the full research article, please visit the source article.
Leave a Reply